You know America is this kind of a funny area, land of the free property of the brave. Freest of the free but there are some subjects that are strictly verboten! I can contact the President a war criminal and a murderer and most people will just nod saying effectively you're entitled to your view. But if you commence to existing evidence to that affect, with apologies to Rod Serling you've just crossed more than into the Twilight Zone. You are a conspiracy theorist and in America a conspiracy theorist is only one particular step above little one abuser, scab or a racist.
Now understand at a murder investigation the police use detectives and technicians to gather proof and formulate a theory as to who may possibly have committed the crime. Then they take their situation to our court methods the judge or jury decides by the weight of evidence whose theory they accept as most likely currently being true. Now the police detective seems to be for a motive, for who would be capable of the crime and who doesn't have a very good alibi or stories will not ring real. But now you happen to be no investigator heck you don't even have a badge! But Bart Simpson once asked "Do you have to get all A's to be a policeman?" You're a conspiracy theorist, your just searching for who could have had motive and the potential to commit the crime and who does not have a great alibi and when their stories do not ring accurate, see the distinction?
It would seem that every single time I attempt to investigation some element of 911 I finish up someplace else.
I was making an attempt to locate out about the tapes of interviews with the New York tower air site visitors controllers I was just currently being curious not hunting for conspiracy.
"6 air site visitors controllers provided accounts of their communications with hijacked planes on Sept, eleven, 2001, on a tape recording that was later on destroyed by Federal Aviation Administration managers, in accordance to a government investigative report issued right now.
It is unclear what details was on the tape simply because no a single ever listened to, transcribed or duplicated it, the report by the Division of Transportation inspector basic mentioned"
Hrs following the hijacked planes flew into the Globe Trade Center Towers, the Pentagon and a Pennsylvania discipline, an FAA manager at the New York Air Route Site visitors Handle Center gathered 6 controllers who communicated or tracked two of the hijacked planes and recorded in a one-hour interview their personalized accounts of what occurred, the report stated.
The manager, who is not named in the report, explained that his intentions have been to provide swift information to federal officials investigating the attack prior to the air visitors controllers concerned took sick depart for the tension of their experiences, as is typical practice.
According to the report, a second manager at the New York center promised a union official representing the controllers that he would "get rid of" the tape following controllers used it to supply written statements to federal officials about the events of the day.
Alternatively, the second manager mentioned he destroyed the tape in between December 2001 and January 2002 by crushing the tape with his hand, cutting it into small pieces and depositing the pieces into trash cans all around the building, the report said.
Washington Publish
Thursday, May possibly 6, 2004
Now if you are the trusting kind you may possibly say he just manufactured a mistake. But now if you're of a suspicious nature or a minimal down conspiracy theorist you may ask, why destroy the tape? What reason? Negligence? Do you suppose it went anything like this?
"Bill when the very first plane hit the tower what have been you doing?" Effectively sir, I had just burnt my lip on my crack pipe so I went down to the bar to get one more beer." "And John is that how you don't forget it?" "I don't know sir I was asleep at the time." Below those conditions I could recognize the FAA destroying a tape. But there is absolutely no proof that the controllers did anything at all incorrect, so why did they ruin this tape?
The official cause,
According to the report, a 2nd manager at the New York center promised a union official representing the controllers that he would "get rid of" the tape right after controllers the utilized it to give written statements to federal officials about the occasions of the day. It is unclear what details was on the tape because no a single ever listened to, transcribed or duplicated it, the report by the Division of Transportation inspector common explained.
Well that can make best sense, absolutely everyone understands what a shut partnership unions and management have. What it tells me a lower down conspiracy theorist is the controllers in deed did nothing incorrect. So, again why ruin the tape? Officially it was utilized it to give written statements to federal officials about the events of the day. Why that reply can make ideal sense except as Colombo would say "Ah just one far more point
did not you say?
"It is unclear what details was on the tape since no 1 ever listened to, transcribed or duplicated it, the report by the Division of Transportation inspector standard explained"
Pea cue Lar ain't it? So in accordance to Federal officials, the air controllers that had communications with the substantial jacker's after the occasion then gave statements on tape for the function of supplying a basis for a written statement. But the tape was never listened to or transcribed but destroyed and then obliterated into irretrievable pieces and the controllers then gave written statements beneath the auspices of their government employer. Can any individual out there in Internet land give me a reason other than that the taped statements didn't match the written statements? You see I have a suspicious nature and soon after all I'm a lower down conspiracy theorist.
What does the government say?
"We feel the audiotape in question seems to be constant with written statements and other supplies supplied to FBI investigators and would not have additional in any important way to the data contained in what has presently been supplied to investigators and members of the 9/eleven commission," stated FAA spokesman Greg Martin.
But how can you be so confident? I guess we'll just have to take your word for it, aside from what else could he say and there is no evidence is there?
A single controller stated she asked to pay attention to the tape in purchase to prepare her written account of her expertise, but one particular of the managers denied her request.
I wonder why? Was not that the stated goal of producing the tape in the first place? But then you already know what I feel I'm a minimal down conspiracy theorist.
No comments:
Post a Comment